Effect of Sowing Date on Yield, Yield-Companent and Grain Protein of Different Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) Genotypes in Jiroft Weather Conditions

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 MSc Graduated, Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Jiroft, Jiroft, Iran

2 Assistant Professor, Department of Agronomy and Plant Breeding, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Jiroft, Jiroft, Iran

3 Instructor, Department of Agricultural and Horticultural Sciences Research , South of Kerman, Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center. Jiroft, Iran

Abstract

Abstract
Quinoa is an annual plant belonging to the Amaranthaceae family with high adaptability and acceptable yield in different environments. In order to determine the most suitable planting date and quinoa genotype, a split plot experiment was conducted in a randomized complete block design with three replications in the research farm of university of Jiroft in 2018-2019 season year. Sowing date in three levels August 23, September 11 and October 2 were as main plots and quinoa genotypes in ten levels Red Carina, Titicaca, Giza1, Q12, Q18, Q21, Q22, Q26, Q29 and Q31 were as sub plots. The results showed the highest plant height (122.9 cm), number of panicles per plant (18), number of spikes per panicle (12.1), biomass yield (9760 kg.ha-1), seed yield (4243.3 kg.ha-1) and protein yield (374.3 kg.ha-1) was related to Q12 variety on the first sowing date. However, Q26 and Q29 genotypes were not significantly different from Q12 genotype in most of the investigated traits. In general, the planting date of September 1 is the best planting date and the Q12, Q26 and Q29 genotypes are recommended for Jiroft region, due to the higher yield and better growth characteristics, it can be recommended on the first of September under the same conditions as this research, although it is necessary to repeat the research for more definitive results.
Introduction
Quinoa belongs to the Taj Khorosian family, it is an annual plant, dicotyledonous, self-growing, broad-leaved, one to two meters high, and has a deep root system (Jacobsen et al., 2003). Ecologically, quinoa is a plant resistant to acidic soil conditions, drought, frost (Valencia-Camuro, 2004), hot and dry weather. Sowing date due to the change in temperature, day length, temperature, and relative humidity has a significant effect on the growth and development of the plant during the growing season and is one of the most important management factors affecting the production of crops (Khichar and Niwas, 2006). The autumn sowing date of quinoa varies from September to late November. In general, according to different climates and temperature during planting and harvesting, the date of planting can be determined for each region (Bagheri, 2017). This study was conducted with the aim of investigating the history of different cultivations in different cultivars and genotypes of quinoa in the subtropical region of Jiroft.
Material and Methods
In order to determine the most suitable planting date and quinoa genotype, a split plot experiment was conducted in a randomized complete block design with three replications in the research farm of university of Jiroft in 2018-2019 season year. Sowing date in three levels August 23, September 11 and October 2 were as main plots and quinoa genotypes in ten levels Red Carina, Titicaca, Giza1, Q12, Q18, Q21, Q22, Q26, Q29 and Q31 were as sub plots. Quinoa seeds were cultivated manually with a distance between rows of 50 cm and a distance between plants of 5 cm (Bagheri, 2017). A drip irrigation system was used for irrigation.The origin of genotypes Q12, Q18, Q19, Q21, Q22, Q26, Q27, Q29, Q31 is Chile, Red Carina of Egypt and Titicaca of Denmark (Bazile et al., 2016). The genotypes used in this research were obtained from the Research and Education Center for Agriculture and Natural Resources in the south of Kerman province, located in Jiroft city. At the end of the growing season, yield traits and yield components were measured per unit area after removing the margin effect. Seed protein concentration was measured by modified Bradford method (Lorin and Matolis, 2005). Data were analyzed using SAS software and means were compared using the least significant difference (Dancan) at the 5% level.
Results and discussion
The results showed the highest plant height (122.9 cm), number of panicles per plant (18), number of spikes per panicle (12.1), biomass yield (9760 kg.ha-1), seed yield (4243.3 kg.ha-1) and protein yield (374.3 kg.ha-1) was related to Q12 variety on the first sowing date. However, Q26 and Q29 genotypes were not significantly different from Q12 genotype in most of the investigated traits. Delay in planting date caused a significant decrease in seed yield. Comparison of the average effect of planting date on seed yield showed that the highest seed yield was obtained from the first and second planting dates with an average of 3,397.6 and 3,163 kg.ha-1, respectively, and the lowest was from the third planting date with an average of 2,093.3 kg.ha-1. Parger et al. (2018) observed the highest seed yield among the studied quinoa genotypes in the Zeno genotype with 2430 kg. Seed yield had a positive and significant correlation with plant height, stem diameter, number of panicles per plant, number of spikelets per panicle. The results of protein yield showed that genotype Q12 had the highest protein yield with 585.9 kg.ha-1 and Red Carina and Titicaca cultivars (224.1 and 193.6 kg.ha-1) had the lowest protein yield. The amount of quinoa seed protein is a function of the improvement of traits such as the number of panicles per plant, the weight of 1000 seeds, the harvest index and the biomass weight, which occurs following suitable temperature conditions with different phenological stages of the plant.
Conclusion
In general, the planting date of September 1 is the best planting date and the Q12, Q26 and Q29 genotypes are recommended for Jiroft region, due to the higher yield and better growth characteristics, it can be recommended on the first of September under the same conditions as this research, although it is necessary to repeat the research for more definitive results.

Keywords

Main Subjects


Abdelazim Sayed, A. A. 2018. Chemical and technological evaluation of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) cultivated in Egypt. Journal of Acta Scientific Nutritional Health, 2 (7): 42-53.
Angeli, V., Miguel Silva, P., Crispim Massuela, D., Waleed Khan, M., Hamar, A., Khajehei, F., Graeff-Hönninger, S. and Piatti, C. 2020. Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.): An Overview of the Potentials of the “Golden Grain” and Socio-Economic and Environmental Aspects of Its Cultivation and Marketization. Foods, 9 (2): 216.
Bazile, D., Pulvento, C., Verniau, A., Al-Nusairi, M. S., Ba, D., Breidy, J., Hassan, L., Mohammed, M. I., Mambetov, O., Otambekova, M., Sepahvand, N. A., Shams, A., Souici, D., Miri, K. and Padulosi, S. 2016. Worldwide Evaluations of Quinoa: Preliminary Results from Post International Year of Quinoa FAO Projects in Nine Countries. Front. Plant Science, 7: 1-18.
Bagheri, M. 2017. Quinoa cultivation. Research institute for breeding and production of seedlings and seeds. 15p. (In Persian).
Bagheri, M., Anafjeh, Z., Keshavarz, S. and Foladi, B. 2021. Evaluation of quantitative and qualitative characteristics of new quinoa genotypes in spring cultivation at Karaj. Iranian Journal of Field Crops Research, 18 (4):  465-475. (In Persian).
Bahrami, M. and Talebnejad, R. 2019. The effect of spring and autumn planting dates and low irrigation on the growth and yield of Chenopodium quinoa Willd. in Bajgah area of Fars province. The 15th National Conference on Irrigation and Evaporation Reduction. Kerman, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman. (In Persian).
Carrotero, R., Serrayo, R. A., Bnet, M. O., Perello A. E. and Miralles, D. J. 2010. Absorbed radiotion and radiation use efficiency as effected by foliar diseases in relation to their vertical position into the canopy in wheat. Field Crops Research, 916: 189-195.
Casini, P. 2019. Seed yield of two new quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) breeding lines as affected by sowing date in Central Italy. Acta agriculturae Slovenica,113 (1): 51-62.
Etaati, M., Ardakani, M. A., Bagheri, M., Paknejad F. and Golzardi, F. 2023. Grain yield adaptability and stability of Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) genotypes using different stability indices. Journal of Crop Ecophysiology, 17 (1): 1-14. (In Persian).
Fazeli, F., Akbari, Gh. A., Naderi Arefi, M. A. and Benakashani, F. 2021. Response of different quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa) genotypes to planting date in terms of morphological traits, yield and yield components in Garmsar region. Iranian Journal of Field Crop Science, 52 (2): 41-49. (In Persian).
Jacobsen, S. E., Mujica, A. and Jensen, C. R. 2003. The resistance of Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) to adverse abiotic factors. Food Reviews International, 19 (1-2): 99-109.
Karimi, M. M. and Siddique, H. M. 1999. Crop growth and relative growth rates of old and modern wheat cultivars. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 42: 13-20.
Khanalizadegan, A., Madandoust, M., Mohajeri, F. and Bagheri, M. 2020. Effects of planting date on yield characteristics of Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Wild.). International Journal of Pharmaceutical and Phytopharmacological Research, 10 (1): 290-298.
Khichar, M. L. and Niwas, R. 2006. Microclimatic profiles under different sowing environments in wheat. Journal of Agrometeorology, 8 (2): 201-209.
Lovrien, R. and Matulis, D. 2005. Assays for total protein. Current Protocols in Microbiology, 00, A.3A.1–A.3A.14.
Matiasevich, S. B., Castellion, M. L., Maldonado, S. B. and Buera. M. P. 2006. Waterdependent thermal transition in quinoa embroys. Thermochimica Acta, 448: 117-122.
Nagib, S. R., Gahory, A. M. O. and Hassan, A. A. 2020. Productivity and quality of quinoa yield (chenopodium quinoa Willd.) as affected by planting date and plant spacings. Scientific Journal Flowers and Ornamental Plants, 7 (4): 541-548.
Naneli, I. and Dokuyucu, T. 2017. Response of the quinoa genotypes to different locations by grain yield and yield components. International Journal of Agriculture Innovations and Research, 6 (3): 446-451.
Parger, A., Munz, S., Nkebiwe, P. M., Mastand, B. and Graeff-Honninger, S. 2018. Yield and quality characteristics of different quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) cultivars grown under field conditions in southwestern Germany. Agronomy Journal, 8 (10): 1-19.
Razzaghi, F., Ahmadi, S. H., Adolf, V. I., Jensen, C. R., Jacobsen, S. E. and Andersen, M. N. 2012. Water relations and transpiration of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) under salinity and soil drying. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science, 197: 348-360.
Rojas, W., Barriga, P. and Figueroa, H. 2003. Multivariate analysis of genetic diversity of Bolivian quinoa germplasm. Journal of Food Reveiws International, 9: 167-177.
Saeidi, S. M., Siadat, S. A., Moshatati, A., Moradi –Telavat, M. and Sepahvand, N. A. 2019. Effect of sowing time and nitrogen fertilizer rates on growth, seed yield and nitrogen use efficiency of Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) in Ahvaz. Iranian Journal of Crop Science, 21 (4): 354-366. (In Persian).
Salehi, M. 2019. Comparison of yield and yield components of different quinoa lines in autumn rainfed cultivation in Gorgan city. Crop Prpduction, 13 (1): 17-30. (In Persian).
Sarjamei, F., Khorasani, S. and Nezhad. N. 2014. Effect of planting methods and plant density, on morphological, phenological, yield and yield component of baby corn. Journal of Advance in Agriculture and Biology, 2 (1): 20-25.
Siddiqi, E. H., Asraf, M. and Akram, N. A. 2007. Variation in seed germination and seedling growth in some diverse lines of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) under salt stress. Pakistan Journal of Botany, 39 (6): 1937-1944.
Temel, S. and Yolcu, S. 2020. The effect of different sowing time and harvesting stages on the herbage yield and quality of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.). Biology Turkish Journal of Field Crops, 25(1):41-49.
Valencia-chamorro, S. A. 2004. Quinoa. Encyclopedia of Grain Science, Pp: 918-925.
Vasconcelos, E. S., Echer, M., Marcia de, M., Kliemann, M. A. and Júnior, L. M. 2019. Selection and recommend of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa) genotypes based on the yield genotypic adaptability and stability. Revista Ceres, 66 (2): 117-123.