Production of Bio-derived Humic Acid from Lignocellulosic Wastes Using Trichoderma harzianum and Evaluating its Structural and Antifungal Properties effect on Wheat on Wheat Growth

Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Graduate PhD, Department of Plant Production and Genetics, University of Bu-Ali-Sina, Hamedan, Iran

2 Associate Professor, Department of Plant Production and Genetics, University of Bu-Ali-Sina, Hamedan, Iran

Abstract

Introduction
Humic substances are essential organic components of soil that significantly influence nutrient availability, microbial activity, and soil aggregation. Conventional humic acids are mainly extracted from mineral sources such as leonardite, which are nonrenewable and environmentally limiting. Consequently, interest has grown in bio-derived humic substances produced from agricultural residues via microbial fermentation. Among microorganisms, Trichoderma harzianum is recognized for its lignocellulolytic and biocontrol capabilities, making it an ideal candidate for converting lignocellulosic wastes into biologically active humic-like substances. The present study was designed to produce bio-humic acid through solid-state fermentation of agricultural residues using T. harzianum, characterize its chemical and structural features, and evaluate its antifungal and growth-promoting effects on wheat under greenhouse conditions.
 
Materials and Methods
The fermentation was carried out in a 500-liter polyethylene solid-state bioreactor equipped with a centrifugal blower for aeration and sensors for temperature and oxygen monitoring. The lignocellulosic substrate consisted of chopped wheat straw (40–50 mm) adjusted to 60% moisture. Pasteurization was performed using steam at 80 °C for 60–90 minutes to minimize microbial contamination. The substrate was supplemented with 1% molasses (Brix 60) to provide easily available carbon. The fungal inoculum, identified as T. harzianum based on β-tubulin gene sequencing (accession no. PV176108), was introduced, and the fermentation proceeded at 28–30 °C for 8–10 days. After completion, humic substances were extracted using 4% potassium hydroxide, followed by multistage filtration and centrifugation. The filtrate was sterilized for further analysis. Structural and chemical characterization involved Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, ultraviolet–visible spectrophotometry, field emission scanning electron microscopy, gas chromatography–mass spectrometry, and liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry. The antifungal effect of the bio-humic extract was tested against Fusarium graminearum and Rhizoctonia solani using the well diffusion method, while the plant growth response was evaluated in a greenhouse pot experiment under artificial infection with Fusarium. Enzymatic activity was determined on carboxymethyl cellulose agar to verify cellulase production by T. harzianum.
 
Results
The FTIR spectrum of the bio-humic acid exhibited characteristic absorption bands at approximately 3400 cm⁻¹ (O–H stretching), 1720 cm⁻¹ (C=O stretching of carboxylic and carbonyl groups), and 1100–600 cm⁻¹ (C–O and C–H bending). The higher intensity of the carbonyl band relative to the commercial humic acid indicated greater abundance of oxygen-containing functional groups and a more reactive molecular structure. UV–Vis analysis showed a higher E4/E6 ratio, suggesting lower aromaticity and higher biological reactivity. FE-SEM micrographs obtained at two magnifications revealed a layered, porous morphology with cellulose nanocrystals between 30 and 100 nm. The nanostructure reflected partial enzymatic degradation of lignocellulosic fibers during fermentation, increasing surface area and adsorption capacity. Such morphology implies enhanced ion exchange and improved water-holding potential in soil. Chromatographic analyses confirmed the presence of aromatic esters, phenolic compounds, and organic acids derived from fungal metabolism. The methanolic extract contained Benzenpropanoic acid, 3,5-bis(1,1-dimethylethyl)-4-hydroxy-, methyl ester, while the ethyl acetate extract predominantly contained 1,4-Benzenedicarboxylic acid, bis(2-ethylhexyl) ester. These compounds suggested partial esterification reactions that increased structural stability of the humic matrix. LC–MS analysis identified a molecular ion at m/z = 351.27 corresponding to Viridin, a well-known antifungal metabolite from T. harzianum. The well diffusion assay demonstrated inhibition zones of 2.3 ± 0.10 mm for F. graminearum and 1.30 ± 0.19 mm for R. solani in response to the 1% bio-humic extract, confirming antifungal potential. No inhibition was observed in the control. In the greenhouse experiment, wheat grown in infected soil without fertilizer had only 71% germination, whereas bio-humic treatment restored germination to 100%, comparable to healthy control plants. Mean shoot length (31.2 ± 1.4 cm) and dry weight (2.35 ± 0.15 g) in the bio-humic treatment were not significantly different from those in uninfected controls, while plants treated with commercial humic acid showed intermediate growth responses.
Discussion
The structural features observed in FTIR and UV–Vis analyses suggest that the biological fermentation pathway generated humic substances with higher oxygenated functionality and reduced aromatic condensation compared with mineral-derived humic acids. The porous nanostructure visible in FE-SEM images is characteristic of biologically formed humic matter and supports improved ion exchange, water retention, and microbial colonization in soil. The presence of esterified and phenolic derivatives detected by GC–MS indicates biochemical modification of lignin intermediates during fermentation, while the detection of Viridin reveals integration of antifungal metabolites into the humic matrix. The bio-humic product thus acts as a multifunctional material, combining physicochemical soil amendment properties with biological control potential. The fungal secondary metabolites contribute to suppression of soilborne pathogens, whereas the oxygen-rich humic structure enhances nutrient availability and promotes root development. The positive greenhouse results demonstrate that bio-humic application mitigates disease stress and maintains plant vigor without chemical fungicides. The combination of humification and biocontrol mechanisms in a single process reflects an emerging approach to biofertilizer development. By coupling organic matter recycling with microbial metabolism, this method provides a route to renewable, environmentally friendly soil conditioners that replace costly and ecologically burdensome mineral humic acids.
 
Conclusion
This study demonstrated that Trichoderma harzianum can effectively transform lignocellulosic wastes into a bio-humic acid with reactive functional groups, nanostructured morphology, and antifungal bioactivity. The product inhibited major soilborne pathogens and enhanced wheat growth under infected conditions, functioning simultaneously as a soil conditioner and a biocontrol agent. The integration of structural stability, biological activity, and sustainability makes bio-humic production via fungal fermentation a promising strategy for advancing environmentally compatible agriculture.
 
Acknowledgements
This research was conducted at the Agricultural Biotechnology Laboratory, Department of Plant Production and Genetics, Faculty of Agriculture, Bu-Ali Sina University, with financial support from Mazo Gene Razak Kala Company.

Keywords

Main Subjects


Ampong, K., Thilakaranthna, M. S. and Gorim, L. Y. (2022). Understanding the role of humic acids on crop performance and soil health. Frontiers in Agronomy, 4, 848621.
Baigorri, R., Fuentes, M., González-Gaitano, G. and García-Mina, J. M. (2007). Analysis of molecular aggregation in humic substances in solution. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 302(1–3), 301–306.
Balouiri, M., Sadiki, M. and Ibnsouda, S. K. (2016). Methods for in vitro evaluating antimicrobial activity: A review. Journal of Pharmaceutical Analysis, 6(2), 71–79.
Bischof, R. H., Ramoni, J. and Seiboth, B. (2016). Cellulases and beyond: The first 70 years of the enzyme producer Trichoderma reesei. Microbial Cell Factories, 15(1), 106.
Bulgari, D., Alias, C., Peron, G., Ribaudo, G., Gianoncelli, A., Savino, S. and Gobbi, E. (2023). Solid-state fermentation of Trichoderma spp.: A new way to valorize the agricultural digestate and produce value-added bioproducts. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 71(10), 3994–4004.
Canellas, L. P. and Olivares, F. L. (2014). Physiological responses to humic substances as plant growth promoter. Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture, 1(1), 3.
Chen, J., Gu, B., LeBoeuf, E. J., Pan, H. and Dai, S. (2002). Spectroscopic characterization of the structural and functional properties of natural organic matter fractions. Chemosphere, 48(1), 59–68.
Chen, Y., Senesi, N. and Schnitzer, M. (1977). Information provided on humic substances by E4/E6 ratios. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 41(2), 352–358.
Chen, Y., Senesi, N. and Schnitzer, M. (1977). Information provided on humic substances by E4/E6 ratios. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 41(2), 352–358.
Cheng, G., Cui, Y., Sun, Z. and Li, J. (2019). Extraction of humic acid from lignite by KOH: Process optimization and characterization. Applied Sciences, 9(7), 1356.
de Souza, A. F. F., García, A. C., Sátiro, J. N. de O., de Lima, B. R., Fernandes, M. S., Berbara, R. L. L. and Santos, L. A. (2025). Humic acid regulates root growth through ROS-dependent pathway and hormone signaling in rice. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 73(32), 20081–20093.
Druzhinina, I. S., Seidl-Seiboth, V., Herrera-Estrella, A., Horwitz, B. A., Kenerley, C. M., Monte, E., ... Kubicek, C. P. (2011). Trichoderma: the genomics of opportunistic success. Nature Reviews Microbiology, 9(10), 749-759.
Florencio, C., Couri, S. and Farinas, C. S. (2012). Correlation between agar plate screening and solid‐state fermentation for the prediction of cellulase production by Trichoderma strains. Enzyme Research, 2012(1), 793708.
Florencio, C., Cunha, F. M., Badino, A. C., Farinas, C. S., Ximenes, E. and Ladisch, M. R. (2016). Secretome analysis of Trichoderma reesei and Aspergillus niger cultivated by submerged and sequential fermentation processes: enzyme production for sugarcane bagasse hydrolysis. Enzyme and microbial technology90, 53-60.
Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). (2017). The future of food and agriculture – Trends and challenges. Rome: FAO.
Fuentes, M., Baigorri, R., González-Gaitano, G. and García-Mina, J. M. (2018). New methodology to assess the quantity and quality of humic substances in organic materials and commercial products for agriculture. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 18(4), 1389–1399.
Fuentes, M., González-Gaitano, G. and García-Mina, J. M. (2006). The usefulness of UV-visible and fluorescence spectroscopies to study the chemical nature of humic substances from soils and composts. Organic Geochemistry, 37(11), 1949–1959.
Fukushima, M., Fujisawa, N., Furubayashi, K., Iwai, H., Otsuka, K., Yamamoto, M., ... & Horiya, S. (2012). Structural features and Fe(II)-binding capacities of humic acids from reservoir sediments. Journal of Chemical Engineering of Japan, 45(6), 452–458.
Gams, W. and Bissett, J. (1998). Morphology and identification of Trichoderma. In C. P. Kubicek & G. E. Harman (Eds.), Trichoderma and Gliocladium, Vol. 1: Basic biology, taxonomy and genetics (pp. 3-34). Taylor & Francis.
Guzmán-Guzmán, P., Kumar, A., de los Santos-Villalobos, S., Parra-Cota, F. I., Orozco-Mosqueda, M. D. C., Fadiji, A. E., Hyder, S., Babalola, O. O. and Santoyo, G. (2023). Trichoderma species: Our best fungal allies in the biocontrol of plant diseases—A review. Plants, 12(3), 432.
Hu, Z.-T., Zhou, W., Lin, Q. and Fang, Z. (2022). Humic substances derived from biomass waste during aerobic composting and hydrothermal treatment: A review. Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology, 10, 878686.
Hubka, V., Kolarik, M., Kubátová, A. and Peterson, S. W. (2012). Taxonomic revision of Aspergillus section Petersonii based on β-tubulin and ITS sequence data. IMA Fungus, 3(1), 97-133.
Klavins, M. and Purmalis, O. (2014). Characterization of humic acids from raised bog peat. Latvian Journal of Chemistry, 52(1–2), 83.
Lal, R. (2019). Eco-intensification through soil carbon sequestration: Harnessing ecosystem services and advancing sustainable development goals. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, 74(3), 55A–61A.
Martínez, Á. T., Speranza, M., Ruiz-Dueñas, F. J., Ferreira, P., Camarero, S., Guillén, F., ... & del Río Andrade, J. C. (2005). Biodegradation of lignocellulosics: Microbial, chemical, and enzymatic aspects of the fungal attack of lignin.
Mbarki, S., Cerdà, A., Brestic, M., Mahendra, R., Abdelly, C. and Pascual, J. A. (2017). Vineyard compost supplemented with Trichoderma harzianum T78 improves saline soil quality. Land Degradation & Development, 28(4), 1028–1037.
Meryemoglu, B. and Ozsel, B. K. (2022). Humic acids derived from lignocellulosic biomass: Characterization and utilizing for environmental applications. Water, Air, & Soil Pollution, 233(10), 402.
Mitchell, D. A., Lonsane, B. K. and Krieger, N. (2000). Biochemical engineering aspects of solid-state bioprocessing. Advances in Biochemical Engineering/Biotechnology, 68, 61-138.
Motta, F. L. and Santana, M. H. A. (2013). Production of humic acids from oil palm empty fruit bunch by submerged fermentation with Trichoderma viride: Cellulosic substrates and nitrogen sources. Biotechnology Progress, 29(3), 631–637.
Nardi, S., Concheri, G., Pizzeghello, D., Sturaro, A., Rella, R. and Parvoli, G. (2000). Soil organic matter mobilization by root exudates. Chemosphere, 41(5), 653–658.
Nardi, S., Schiavon, M. and Francioso, O. (2021). Chemical structure and biological activity of humic substances define their role as plant growth promoters. Molecules26(8), 2256.
Olivares, F. L., Busato, J. G., de Paula, A. M., da Silva Lima, L., Aguiar, N. O. and Canellas, L. P. (2017). Plant growth promoting bacteria and humic substances: crop promotion and mechanisms of action. Chemical and biological technologies in agriculture4(1), 30.
Piccolo, A. and Spiteller, M. (2003). Electrospray ionization mass spectrometry of terrestrial humic substances and their size fractions. Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry, 377(6), 1047–1059.
Puglisi, E., Pascazio, S., Suciu, N., Cattani, I., Fait, G., Spaccini, R., ... & Trevisan, M. (2013). Rhizosphere microbial diversity as influenced by humic substance amendments and chemical composition of rhizodeposits. Journal of Geochemical Exploration129, 82-94.
Rani, J., Kumari, S. and Paul, B. (2024). Extraction and chemical characterization of humic acid produced from lignite coals of arid region of Gujarat, Western India. Scientific Reports, 14(1), 30923.
Rathor, P., Upadhyay, P., Ullah, A., Gorim, L. Y. and Thilakarathna, M. S. (2024). Humic acid improves wheat growth by modulating auxin and cytokinin biosynthesis pathways. AoB Plants, 16(2), plae018.*
Sadh, P. K., Duhan, S. and Duhan, J. S. (2018). Agro-industrial wastes and their utilization using solid state fermentation: a review. Bioresources and Bioprocessing, 5(1), 1-15.
Saldarriaga-Hernández, S., Velasco-Ayala, C., Flores, P. L. I., de Jesús Rostro-Alanis, M., Parra-Saldivar, R., Iqbal, H. M. and Carrillo-Nieves, D. (2020). Biotransformation of lignocellulosic biomass into industrially relevant products with the aid of fungi-derived lignocellulolytic enzymes. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules, 161, 1099–1116.
Sarlaki, E., Kianmehr, M. H., Marzban, N., Shafizadeh, A., Sheikh Ahmad Tajuddin, S. A. F., Hu, S., Tabatabaei, M. and Aghbashlo, M. (2024). Advances and challenges in humic acid production technologies from natural carbonaceous material wastes. Chemical Engineering Journal, 155521.
Shoresh, M., Harman, G. E. and Mastouri, F. (2010). Induced systemic resistance and plant responses to fungal biocontrol agents. Annual Review of Phytopathology, 48, 21–43.
Singh, R. K., Pandey, P. K., Singh, R. N., Swati, & Nain, L. (2012). Correlation between agar plate screening and solid-state fermentation for the prediction of cellulase production by Trichoderma strains. Enzyme Research, 2012, 793708.
Singhania, R. R., Patel, A. K., Soccol, C. R. and Pandey, A. (2009). Recent advances in solid-state fermentation. Biochemical Engineering Journal, 44(1), 13-18.
Soccol, C. R. and Vandenberghe, L. P. S. (2003). Overview of applied solid-state fermentation in Brazil. Biochemical Engineering Journal, 13(2-3), 205-218.
Spaccini, R., Piccolo, A., Drosos, M. and Vinci, G. (2024). Antibacterial and antioxidant properties of humic substances from composted agricultural biomasses. Chemical and Biological Technologies in Agriculture, 11(1), 1–15.
Stavi, I., Thevs, N. and Priori, S. (2021). Soil salinity and sodicity in drylands: A review of causes, effects, monitoring, and restoration measures. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 9, 712831.
Stevenson, F. J. (1994). Humus chemistry: Genesis, composition, reactions (2nd ed.). Wiley.
Stracquadanio, C., Quiles, J. M., Meca, G. and Cacciola, S. O. (2020). Antifungal activity of bioactive metabolites produced by Trichoderma asperellum and Trichoderma atroviride in liquid medium. Journal of Fungi, 6(4), 263.
Teather, R. M. and Wood, P. J. (1982). Use of Congo red-polysaccharide interactions in enumeration and characterization of cellulolytic bacteria from the bovine rumen. Applied and environmental microbiology43(4), 777-780.
Vasileiadis, S., Puglisi, E., Arena, M., Cappa, F., Van Veen, J. A., Cocconcelli, P. S. and Trevisan, M. (2013). Soil microbial diversity patterns of a lowland spring environment. FEMS Microbiology Ecology, 86(2), 172–184.
Vinale, F., Sivasithamparam, K., Ghisalberti, E. L., Marra, R., Woo, S. L. and Lorito, M. (2008). Trichoderma–plant–pathogen interactions. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 40(1), 1–10.
Vinale, F., Sivasithamparam, K., Ghisalberti, E. L., Ruocco, M., Woo, S. and Lorito, M. (2012). Trichoderma secondary metabolites that affect plant metabolism. Natural Product Communications, 7(11), 1934578X1200701133.
Vinale, F., Sivasithamparam, K., Ghisalberti, E. L., Woo, S. L., Nigro, M., Marra, R., ... & Lorito, M. (2014). Trichoderma secondary metabolites active on plants and fungal pathogens. Open Mycology Journal, 8(1), 127–139.
Vinci, G., Cangemi, S., Bridoux, M., Spaccini, R. and Piccolo, A. (2021). Molecular properties of the Humeome of two calcareous grassland soils as revealed by GC/qTOF-MS and NMR spectroscopy. Chemosphere, 279, 130518.
Zandonadi, D. B., Santos, M. P., Busato, J. G., Peres, L. E. P. and Façanha, A. R. (2013). Plant physiology as affected by humified organic matter. Theoretical and Experimental Plant Physiology25, 13-25.
Zhai, S., Wang, L., Yu, F., Gao, Z., Yang, X., Cao, X., Shaghaleh, H. and Hamoud, Y. A. (2025). Effects of Trichoderma harzianum combined with Phanerochaete chrysosporium on lignin degradation and humification during chicken manure and rice husk composting. Frontiers in Microbiology, 16, 1515931.
Zhang, Y., Li, M., Yang, R., Chen, W. and Li, H. (2021). Extraction and structural characterization of humic acids from composted agricultural wastes using FTIR and elemental analysis. International Journal of Agricultural and Biological Engineering, 14(4), 187–194.
Zhang, W., Sunami, K., Liu, S., Triana, D., Tachrim, Z. P., Kikuchi, R., ... & Murai, Y. (2025). Scalable preparation of furanosteroidal viridin, β-viridin and viridiol from Trichoderma virens. Scientific Reports, 15(1), 3110.
Zhou, L., Yuan, L., Zhao, B., Li, Y. and Lin, Z. (2019). Structural characteristics of humic acids derived from Chinese weathered coal under different oxidizing conditions. PLoS One, 14(5), e0217469.
Ezeonuegbu, B. A., Abdullahi, M. D., Whong, C. M., Sohunago, J. W., Kassem, H. S., Yaro, C. A., ... & Batiha, G. E. S. (2022). Characterization and phylogeny of fungi isolated from industrial wastewater using multiple genes. Scientific Reports12(1), 2094.