تحلیل جامع اثرات زیست‌محیطی کشت خیار گلخانه‌ای و روباز با استفاده از ارزیابی چرخه زندگی در دشت همدان - بهار: یک مقایسه عملی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان

1 کارشناسی‌ارشد، گروه مهندسی بیوسیستم، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه بوعلی سینا، همدان، ایران

2 استادیار، گروه مهندسی بیوسیستم، دانشکده کشاورزی، دانشگاه بوعلی سینا، همدان، ایران

چکیده

این مطالعه به مقایسه اثرات زیست‌محیطی تولید خیار در دو سیستم کشاورزی گلخانه‌ای و روباز با استفاده از روش ارزیابی چرخه حیات (LCA) پرداخته است. پژوهش در دشت همدان-بهار انجام شده و با استفاده از داده‌های میدانی محلی، اثرات زیست‌محیطی هر دو سیستم تولید خیار ارزیابی گردید. نتایج این تحقیق نشان می‌دهند که کشت گلخانه‌ای نسبت به کشت روباز مصرف بیشتری از نهاده‌ها و انرژی دارد. به‌طور خاص، مصرف برق در کشت گلخانه‌ای به میزان 1072/2 کیلووات ساعت در هر تن محصول نسبت به ۳۲۰ کیلووات ساعت در کشت روباز و مصرف سوخت دیزل در کشت گلخانه‌ای 5/08 لیتر در هر تن محصول نسبت به 2/9 لیتر در کشت روباز بیشتر است. همچنین مصرف کود نیتروژن در کشت گلخانه‌ای ۶ کیلوگرم در هر تن محصول نسبت به ۳ کیلوگرم در کشت روباز و مصرف کود دامی در کشت گلخانه‌ای ۹۰۰ کیلوگرم در هر تن محصول نسبت به ۱۵۴ کیلوگرم در کشت روباز بیشتر است. از منظر اثرات زیست‌محیطی، کشت گلخانه‌ای نسبت به کشت روباز تأثیرات بیشتری در زمینه‌های مختلف دارد. به‌طور خاص، شاخص گرم شدن برای یک تن خیار در کشت گلخانه‌ای ۱۱۱ گرم CO₂ معادل نسبت به 95/1 گرم CO₂ معادل در کشت روباز بوده است. نتایج نشان داد که مصرف بیشتر نهاده‌ها در کشت گلخانه‌ای، از جمله مصرف بالاتر کود نیتروژن و انرژی، باعث افزایش اثرات منفی زیست‌محیطی مانند گرمایش جهانی و تخریب لایه ازون می‌شود. این مطالعه بر اهمیت استفاده از انرژی‌های تجدیدپذیر مانند انرژی خورشیدی در گلخانه‌ها تأکید دارد تا مصرف انرژی و اثرات منفی زیست‌محیطی کاهش یابد. همچنین، کاهش مصرف کودهای شیمیایی و بهینه‌سازی استفاده از منابع می‌تواند به کاهش اثرات زیست‌محیطی کمک کند. در نهایت، این تحقیق نشان می‌دهد که کشت روباز با مصرف کمتر نهاده‌ها، تأثیرات زیست‌محیطی کمتری دارد، ولی بازدهی آن در مقایسه با کشت گلخانه‌ای پایین‌تر است. بنابراین، برای دستیابی به کشاورزی پایدار، ترکیب بهینه‌ای از سیستم‌های کشت مختلف با استفاده از فناوری‌های جدید و منابع انرژی پاک پیشنهاد می‌شود.

کلیدواژه‌ها

موضوعات


عنوان مقاله [English]

The Comprehensive Environmental Impact Analysis of Greenhouse and Open-Field Cucumber Cultivation Using Life Cycle Assessment in Hamedan-Bahar Plain: A Practical Comparison

نویسندگان [English]

  • Shahram Soltanian 1
  • Behdad Shadidi 2
1 Master's Degree, Department of Biosystems Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Biosystems Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, Bu-Ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran
چکیده [English]

Introduction
The production of fresh vegetables like cucumbers, especially in regions with climatic constraints during certain seasons, plays a crucial role in food security, nutritional health, and the agricultural economy. In Iran and many temperate or cold climate areas, the use of greenhouse systems has been increasing as a method for off-season production with high yield. However, productivity should not be the sole criterion for selecting a cultivation method, as energy, water, fertilizer, plastic, and other inputs in greenhouses can lead to significant environmental impacts if not managed properly. Therefore, a comprehensive environmental assessment of the cucumber production chain, from input supply to harvesting and packaging, is essential for sustainable production decision-making.
 
Material and Methods
This study investigates the environmental impacts of cucumber cultivation using two agricultural systems: greenhouse and open-field, through a Life Cycle Assessment (LCA) approach. The research was conducted in the Hamedan-Bahar plain, utilizing local field data. The study area spans 2,459 square kilometers, with approximately 32,100 hectares dedicated to irrigated agriculture. Data were gathered through surveys and interviews with local farmers, and relevant literature was reviewed to support the research. LCA methodology was employed to model the environmental effects of cucumber production from raw material extraction to waste management, using the SIMAPRO software. The impacts of various inputs, such as chemical fertilizers, energy, pesticides, and fuel consumption, were calculated, and the environmental effects were assessed based on global warming potential (GWP), ozone depletion, and other environmental indicators.
 
Results and Discussion
The results of the study revealed significant differences in the resource consumption and environmental impacts between the greenhouse and open-field cucumber cultivation systems. Specifically, greenhouse cultivation exhibited higher consumption of inputs such as electricity (1072.2 kWh per ton in greenhouses vs. 320 kWh in open fields) and diesel fuel (1.63 liters per ton in greenhouses vs. 2.9 liters in open fields). Additionally, nitrogen fertilizer use in greenhouses was higher (6 kg per ton in greenhouses vs. 3 kg in open fields), as well as manure consumption (900 kg per ton in greenhouses vs. 154 kg in open fields). From an environmental perspective, greenhouse cultivation showed a significantly higher impact in various categories. For example, the global warming potential (GWP) for one ton of cucumbers was 111 grams of CO₂ equivalent in greenhouses, compared to only 95.1 grams of CO₂ equivalent in open-field cultivation. Greenhouses also exhibited higher contributions to ozone layer depletion and other environmental indicators. The findings indicate that while greenhouse cultivation provides better control over environmental conditions and higher yields, it leads to greater environmental burdens due to higher energy and chemical inputs. In contrast, open-field cultivation, though less efficient in terms of yield, results in lower environmental impacts, particularly in terms of energy consumption and fertilizer use. The study emphasizes the importance of renewable energy sources, such as solar energy, to reduce the environmental footprint of greenhouse systems and suggests improving resource efficiency in both cultivation methods to achieve sustainable agricultural practices
 
 
 
 
 
 
Conclusions
The study concludes that greenhouse cucumber cultivation, while more productive, has higher environmental impacts compared to open-field cultivation. This difference is primarily due to the increased consumption of energy, fertilizers, and other inputs in the greenhouse system. Specifically, greenhouse cultivation showed significantly higher consumption of electricity, nitrogen fertilizers, and manure, which contributed to greater environmental impacts such as global warming potential and ozone depletion. However, open-field cultivation, although requiring fewer inputs, results in lower environmental impacts but offers lower yields. The study emphasizes the need for optimizing energy consumption and reducing chemical inputs in greenhouse systems to mitigate their environmental footprint. The adoption of renewable energy sources, such as solar power, is recommended to make greenhouse farming more sustainable. Furthermore, a balanced approach combining both greenhouse and open-field cultivation, along with the use of clean energy technologies, is essential for achieving sustainable agricultural practices in the region.

کلیدواژه‌ها [English]

  • Sustainable agriculture
  • Chemical fertilizers
  • Environmental impacts
  • Ozone depletion
Cavallo, A. C., Parkes, M., Teixeira, R. F. M. and Righi, S. (2025). Life Cycle Assessment of Land Use Trade-Offs in Indoor Vertical Farming. Applied Sciences, 15(15), 8429. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15158429.
Chu, X., Huang, H., Liu, Q., and Zhang, J. (2025). Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of open-field and greenhouse cucumber production. Sustainability, 11(5), 1124-1135.
De, M., Singh, R., Chandra, S. and Kumar, A. (2017). Environmental Impact of Greenhouse and Open-field Production: A Comparative Life Cycle Assessment. Journal of Agricultural Science, 26(3), 123-134.
Ebrahimi Sarindizaj, E. and Zarghami, M. (2018). Comparing effect of restoration policies under climate change by using system dynamics; case study Urmia lake ecosystem, Iran-Water Resources Research, 13(4), 184-189. (In Persian).
Falsafi, A., Togiani, A., Colley, A., Varis, J. and Horttanainen, M. (2025). Life cycle assessment in circular design process: A systematic literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 521, 146188.
Farvardin, M., Taki, M., Gorjian, S., Shabani, E. and Sosa‑Savedra, J.  C. (2024). Assessing the Physical and Environmental Aspects of Greenhouse Cultivation: A Comprehensive Review of Conventional and Hydroponic Methods. Sustainability, 16(3), 1273.
Fathelrahman, E. et al. (2025). Life cycle assessment of open and closed hydroponic systems for vegetable tomato and cucumber production in arid lands. Journal of Cleaner Production.
Fathi, M., Rahmani, F., Mohammadi, F. and Hassani, S. (2019). Greenhouse gas emissions in agricultural production. Environmental Science and Technology, 43(3), 44-52.
Guan, W., Maynard, E.  T., Aly, B., Zakes, J. and Egel, D. S. (2019). Parthenocarpic cucumber cultivar evaluation in high‑tunnel production. HortTechnology, 29(5), 634-642.
Karami, M., Zarei, M. J., Akhlaghi, M. and Mohammadi, F. (2020). Environmental footprint of greenhouse tomato production. Science of the Total Environment, 707, 135464.
Martin, M., et al. (2024). Environmental life cycle assessment of greenhouse tomato production: conventional vs organic systems. Scientific Reports.
Mousavi, Z. et al. (2018). Life cycle assessment of agricultural practices. Sustainable Agriculture, 34(6), 1287-1302.
Naman, Y. and Kaundal, M. (2025). Renewable energy integration in agriculture, food security and allied sectors. Journal of Scientific Research and Reports, 31(7), 1083-1098.
Partelow, S., Dehghani, M., and Nabavi, S. (2024). Indicator assessment of groundwater resource sustainability in Hamedan–Bahar plain. Environmental Science and Technology, 58(3), 213-221.
Rahmani, M., et al. (2019). Sustainable practices in greenhouse farming: a review. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture, 39(4), 215-229.
Roush, M. et al. (2020). Energy use and emission profiles in agricultural greenhouse operations. Environmental Management, 72(3), 481-495.
Wang, F., Zhang, L., Xu, X., Li, X. and Yang, T. (2018). Environmental impacts of greenhouse and conventional cucumber cultivation in China. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems, 33(6), 636-647.
Zarei, M. et al. (2017). Impact of pesticides and fertilizers in open-field vs. greenhouse production systems. Agricultural Environmental Research, 5(2), 93-102.
Zarei, M. J., Kazemi, N. and Marzban, A. (2017). Life cycle environmental impacts of cucumber and tomato production in open‑field and greenhouse. Journal of the Saudi Society of Agricultural Sciences. DOI:10.1016/j.jssas.2017.07.001
Zhang, Y. et al. (2016). Effects of fertilizer use on global warming potential in greenhouses. Agricultural Systems, 148, 55-63.