Resistance of Wild Barley (Hordeum spontaneum L.) Populations Against Sulfosulfuron Herbicide in Different Fars Regions

Document Type : Short Communication

Authors

1 MSc Student, Department of Agronomy, Islamic Azad University, Fasa Branch, Fasa, Iran

2 Associate Professor, Department of Agronomy, Islamic Azad University, Fasa Branch, Fasa, Iran

Abstract

In order to investigate the resistance of H. spontaneum L. against Sulfosulfuron herbicide, an experiment was conducted in five growing regions of this weed in Fars Province (Iran) in fallow farms that were naturally infected with H. spontaneum. Eight herbicide treatments including 0 (control), 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8 and 16 times the recommended dose (equivalent to 25 g ai.ha-1) in four replicates using the standard error of the mean treatments were compared. The results showed that the level of visual scoring (EWRC) was significantly influenced by Sulfosulfuron herbicide doses. The highest level of weed killing was under treatments of 200 and 400 g ai.ha-1 in all regions of this weed growth. The average survival of wild barley was 8% in different regions with the use of 400 g of herbicide. The dry weight response of H. spontaneum to different doses of Sulfosulfuron evaluated using the fitting of the log-logistic equation, and showed that by consuming up to 100 g of sulfosulfuron, the dry weight of wild barley had a severe reduction of 64%.The resistance degree of different regions biotypes to herbicides was variable considerably. Based on the GR50 ratio, Fasa region was the most resistant of biotype with a resistance degree of 1.22 and then Zarghan biotype was introduced with a resistance degree of 1.11. Eghlid and Jahrom (0.93 and 0.88) were intermediate degree too and Lar was identified as a sensitive biotype.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

باغستانی میبدی، م. ع.، سیدی پور، ح.، زند، ا.، مین باشی معینی، م.، میقانی، ف. و لشکری، ع. 1388. مدیریت تلفیقی علف هرز جودره (.Hordeum spontaneum Koch) در مزارع گندم در شرایط هیرم کاری. نشریه بوم شناسی کشاورزی، 1 (1): 81-89.
نجفی، ح.، باغستانی، م. ع.، زند، ا. 1389. بیولوژی و مدیریت علف های هرز ایران. انتشارات موسسه تحقیقات گیاه‌پزشکی کشور، 590 صفحه.
Beheshtean, M., Mesgaran, M. B., Rahimian, H., Zand, E. and Alizadeh, H. 2007. Comparison of three methodologies for efficient seed extraction in studies of soil weed seedbank. Weed Research, 47: 472-478.
Dhawan, R. S., Punia, S. S., Singh, S., Yadav, D. and Malik, R. K. 2009. Productivity of wheat (Triticum aestivum) as affected by continuous use of new low dose herbicides for Management of little seed canary grass (Phalaris minor) in India. Indian Journal of Agronomy, 54: 58-62.
Dhawan, R. S., Singh, N. and Singh, S. 2012. Little seed canary grass resistance to sulfonyl-urea herbicides and its possible management with pendimethalin. Indian Journal of Weed Science, 44(4): 218-224.
Forcella, F. and Colbach, N. 1999. Application of weed seed bank ecology to weed management. USDA, Agricultural Research Service, 23-35.
Hosseini, M., Ghorbani, R., Rashed Mohassel, M. H. and Yassaie, M. 2021. Wild barely (Hordeum spontaneum Koch.) populations response to sulfosulfuron herbicide. Iranian Journal of Weed Science, 17 (1): 1-16.
Senseman, S. A. 2007. Herbicide Handbook. 9th Edition. Weed Science Society of America. Champaign. 458 p.
Singh, S. 2015. Herbicide mixture and sequential application for managing resistant Phalaris minor, p 186. In: Weed Science. Society of America Annual Meeting, 9-12 February 2015, Lexington, Kentucky.
Streibig, J. C., Rudemo, M. and Jensen, J. E. 1993. Dose-response curves and statistical models. Pages 29-55 in J. C. Streibig and P. Kudsk, eds. Herbicide bioassays. Boca Raton, FL. CRC Press.
Yadav, D. B., Yadav, A., Punia, S. S. and Chauhan, B. S. 2016. Management of herbicide-resistant Phalaris minor in wheat by sequential or tank-mix applications of pre and post emergence herbicides in north-western Indo-Gangetic Plains. Crop Protection, 89: 239-247.
Yu, Q., Han, H., Vilo-Aiub, M. and Powles, S. A. 2010. AHAS herbicide resistance endowing mutation: effect on AHAS functionality and plant growth. Journal of Experimental Botany, 61 (14): 3925-3934.
Volume 14, Issue 1
September 2022
Pages 55-62

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics