دوفصلنامه فنآوری تولیدات گیاهی

دوفصلنامه فنآوری تولیدات گیاهی

ارزیابی عملکرد، اجزای عملکرد و ویژگی‌های کیفی 9 ژنوتیپ لوبیا چیتی تحت تاثیر کاربرد کود نانوفسفره

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان
1 استادیار بخش تحقیقات زراعی باغی، مرکز تحقیقات و آموزش کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی استان اردبیل، سازمان تحقیقات، آموزش و ترویج کشاورزی، اردبیل، ایران.
2 استاد گروه تولید و ژنتیک گیاهی، دانشکده کشاورزی و منابع طبیعی، دانشگاه محقق اردبیلی، اردبیل، ایران.
3 دانش‌آموخته کارشناسی ارشد، دانشگاه محقق اردبیلی، اردبیل، ایران.
10.22084/ppt.2026.31731.2172
چکیده
لوبیا چیتی (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) به‌عنوان یکی از مهم‌ترین حبوبات منبع اصلی پروتئین گیاهی است، اما عملکرد آن به دلایل مختلفی از جمله محدودیت جذب فسفر در خاک‌ها محدود می‌شود. آزمایش در سال ۱۳۹۹ به‌صورت فاکتوریل در قالب طرح بلوک‌های کامل تصادفی با سه تکرار انجام شد. تیمارها شامل ۹ ژنوتیپ لوبیا چیتی (کوشا، غفار، صالح، محلی اردبیل، صدری، تلاش و لاین‌های ۸۰، ۹۰ و ۱۶) و سه سطح کود نانوفسفره (شاهد و محلول‌پاشی یک و دو در هزار) بودند. یافته‌ها نشان داد کود نانوفسفره بر کلیه صفات اندازه‌گیری‌شده تاثیر معنادار داشت. کاربرد سطح دو در هزار نانوفسفر در مقایسه با تیمار شاهد، عملکرد دانه را ۴/۲۶ درصد افزایش داد. همچنین تعداد غلاف در بوته، تعداد دانه در غلاف و وزن صد دانه به ترتیب ۸، ۱۹ و ۸ درصد نسبت به شاهد رشد کردند. کیفیت تغذیه‌ای دانه به‌طور قابل‌توجهی ارتقا یافت و محتوای نیتروژن، پروتئین، فسفر و پتاسیم دانه در تیمار نانوفسفر در مقایسه با شاهد افزایش معنی‌داری داشتند. همچنین تفاوت ژنتیکی بارزی در پاسخ ژنوتیپ‌ها مشاهده شد. ژنوتیپ تلاش با بیشترین عملکرد دانه (۸/۲۳۱۳ کیلوگرم در هکتار) به‌عنوان برترین ژنوتیپ از نظر عملکرد شناخته شد. در مقابل، ژنوتیپ لاین 16 برترین کیفیت دانه را ارائه داد و بالاترین مقادیر پروتئین (۵۵/۲۵ درصد)، فسفر (۵۸۸/۰ درصد) و پتاسیم (۴۶/۴ درصد) را در بین تمامی ژنوتیپ‌ها به خود اختصاص داد. به طور کلی، نتایج این تحقیق نشان داد که کاربرد نانوفسفر همراه با انتخاب ژنوتیپ‌های برتر می‌تواند رویکردی مؤثر برای افزایش کمیت و کیفیت لوبیا چیتی باشد.
کلیدواژه‌ها
موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

Evaluation of yield, yield components and qualitative traits of 9 pinto bean genotypes under the application of nano-phosphorus fertilizer

نویسندگان English

Bahram Dehdar 1
Morteza Barmaki 2
Alireza Haj Mohammadi 3
1 Assistant Professor, Department of Horticultural Crops Research, Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center of Ardabil Province, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Ardabil, Iran.
2 Professor, Department of Plant Production and Genetics, Faculty of Agriculture and Natural Resources, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran
3 M.Sc. Graduate, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran
چکیده English

abstract

Introduction

Common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.), particularly the pinto bean variety, is a vital legume crop in Iran, prized for its high protein content and significant role in ensuring food security and improving household nutrition. However, its productivity is severely limited by environmental stresses and poor soil fertility, especially phosphorus (P) deficiency. Phosphorus is an essential macronutrient critical for root development, energy transfer, photosynthesis, and flower and seed formation. In the calcareous soils, P becomes fixed and unavailable to plants, leading to low use efficiency from conventional fertilizers. Recent innovations in agricultural nanotechnology have introduced nano-phosphorus fertilizers as a promising solution. These fertilizers, characterized by their ultra-small particle size, high surface area, and controlled-release properties, enhance P availability, uptake, and utilization efficiency by plants. While the benefits of nano-P are recognized, a significant research gap exists regarding the field evaluation of genotypic responses of pinto bean to nano-P fertilization, particularly under the specific ecological conditions of Iran. This study was therefore designed to bridge this gap by comprehensively assessing the impact of nano-P fertilizer on the yield, its components, and the seed quality attributes of nine distinct pinto bean genotypes.

Materials and Methods

A field experiment was conducted during the 2020 growing season on a private farm in the Arallou region, Ardabil, Iran. The experiment was laid out as a factorial arrangement based on a Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) with three replications. The factors consisted of nine pinto bean genotypes (Koosha, Ghaffar, Saleh, Local Ardabil, Sadri, Talash, and Lines 80, 90, and 16) and three nano-P fertilizer treatments: foliar application at a concentration of two and one per thousand and an untreated control. The nano-P fertilizer (commercial name: Khazra, 17% P chelate) was applied at three critical growth stages: stem elongation, pre-flowering, and podding. At physiological maturity, yield components, including the number of pods per plant, number of seeds per pod, and hundred seed weight, were measured. Grain yield was calculated and extrapolated to kg per hectare. Collected data were subjected to analysis of variance (ANOVA) using SAS software, and mean comparisons were performed using Duncan's Multiple Range Test at a 5% probability level.

Results and Discussion

The results demonstrated significant main effects of both genotype and nano-P fertilizer on all measured parameters. Foliar application of nano-P fertilizer markedly enhanced overall crop performance. It increased grain yield by 26.4%, from 1706.7 kg ha⁻¹ in the control to 2156.5 kg ha⁻¹in second level of fertilizer. Additionally, the number of pods per plant, number of seeds per pod, and 100-seed weight increased by 8%, 19%, and 8%, respectively, compared to the control. Seed nutritional quality significantly improved, with the nitrogen, protein, phosphorus, and potassium content of seeds in the nano-phosphorus treatment showing a significant increase compared to the control. Significant genotypic variation was observed. The genotype Talash recorded the highest grain yield (2313.8 kg ha⁻¹), primarily driven by a superior number of seeds per pod (4.68). In contrast, Line 16 presented a balanced and desirable profile with high yield (2181.2 kg ha⁻¹) coupled with exceptional seed quality, achieving the highest seed phosphorus (0.588%) and potassium (4.46%) content, along with high protein (25.55%). Nano-P application significantly boosted seed nutritional quality. Seed nitrogen content increased from 3.45% to 3.98%, protein from 21.57% to 24.88%, phosphorus from 0.441% to 0.599%, and potassium from 3.41% to 3.88%. Correlation analysis revealed a strong, positive, and highly significant relationship between seed nitrogen and protein content, which is biologically expected. A notable negative correlation between the number of pods per plant and the number of seeds per pod suggests a compensatory trade-off between these two components. The identification of high-performing and responsive genotypes like 'Talash' and 'Line 16' is crucial for future breeding programs.

Conclusion

In conclusion, this study unequivocally demonstrates that foliar application of nano-phosphorus fertilizer is a highly effective agronomic strategy for significantly enhancing the productivity and nutritional quality of pinto beans. It effectively mitigates the challenges of phosphorus fixation in calcareous soils. The significant genotypic differences highlight the importance of selecting appropriate varieties. Genotypes 'Talash' and 'Line 16' are highly recommended for cultivation under similar conditions due to their outstanding yield and quality characteristics, respectively. The trade-off between yield components underscores the need for a balanced breeding approach.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Genotypic diversity
Nutritional value of seed
Phosphorus content of seed
Potassium content of seed
Seed protein
AACC International. (1999). Method 46-10.01: Crude protein—Improved Kjeldahl method. AACC Methods.
Abou-Sreea, A. I. B., Kamal, M., Sowfy, D. M. E., Rady, M. M., Mohamed, G. F., Al-Dhumri, S. A., Al-Harbi, M. S. and Abdou, N. M. (2022). Small-Sized Nanophosphorus Has a Positive Impact on the Performance of Fenugreek Plants under Soil–Water Deficit Stress: A Case Study under Field Conditions. Biology, 11(1), 115. https://doi.org/10.3390/biology11010115
Afrasiabi, M., Ghasemi, S. and Mohammadian, F. (2021). Effect of phosphate solubilizing bacteria and mycorrhizal fungi along with phosphorus chemical fertilizer on yield and nutrient uptake in common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology, 23(2), 425-437.(in Persian with English abstract).https://doi.org/10.52547/jast.23.2.425
Ansari, S. , Sarikhani, M. R. and Najafi, N. (2015). Inoculation Effect of Common Biofertilizers on Growth and Uptake of Some Elements by Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) in Presence of Soil Indigenous Microflora. Journal of Agricultural Science and Sustainable Production, 25(1), 85-98.
AOAC International. (2005). Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International (18th ed.). AOAC International. Ardabil Province Climatic Yearbook 2020, Iran Meteorological Organization.
Arora, V. and Khosla, B. (2024). Synthesis of phosphorus nano-fertilisers: their strategic applications and effect on plant growth. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 22(2025), 6161–6180. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-024-06110-9
Beebe, S. (2022). Effect of drought and low phosphorus availability on physiological and yield responses in common bean. Frontiers in Plant Science, 13, 814325. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.814325
Bindraban, P. S., Dimkpa, C. O. and Pandey, R. (2020). Exploring phosphorus fertilizers and fertilization strategies for improved human and environmental health. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 56, 299–317. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00374-019-01430-2
Borges, B. M. M. N., Alovisi, A. M. T., Silva, J. A. M., Nascimento, V. L. and Silva, D. A. (2022). Phosphorus fertilization improves nitrogen and potassium nutrition in common bean plants under non-limiting conditions. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 45(7), 1015-1027.https://doi.org/10.1080/01904167.2021.1998523
Carmona, F. J., Guagliardi, A. and Masciocchi, N. (2022). Nanosized Calcium Phosphates as Novel Macronutrient Nano-Fertilizers. Nanomaterials, 12(15), 2709. https://doi.org/10.3390/nano12152709
Daemo, B. B. (2024). Genotype by environment interaction and performance stability of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) cultivars grown in Dawuro zone, Southwestern Ethiopia. Open Agriculture, 9(1),20220288.https://doi.org/10.1515/opag-2022-0288
Dapkekar, A., Deshpande, P. and Oak, M. D. (2023). Nano-enabled phosphorus delivery systems for mitigating abiotic stress and improving reproductive development in legumes. Plant Stress, 9, 100187. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.stress.2023.100187
Dey, G., Banerjee, P. and Sharma, R. K. (2021). Integrated nutrient management for improving yield and nutrient use efficiency in French bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) under subtropical conditions. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 44(5), 669-682.https://doi.org/10.1080/01904167.2020.1849285
El-Ghany, M. F. A., El-Kherbawy, M. I., Abdel-Aal, Y. A., El-Dek, S. I. and Abd El-Baky, T. (2021). Comparative Study between Traditional and Nano Calcium Phosphate Fertilizers on Growth and Production of Snap Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Plants. Nanomaterials, 11(11), 2913.https://doi.org/10.3390/nano11112913
Firouzkouhi, F., Darvishzadeh, R., Bernousi, I. and Ghasemzadeh, R. (2024). Development of Selection Index to Improve Grain Yield in Maize under Normal and Phosphorus Deficit Conditions. Journal of Crop Breeding, 16(1), 116-128. (in Persian with English abstract).10.61186/jcb.16.49.116
Ghamari, T. , Souri, M. K. , Arab, M. and Azadegan, B. (2017). Effect of Different Levels and Methods of Phosphorus Fertilizer Application on Growth and Development of Two Stock (Matthiola incana L.) Cultivars. , 9(2), 1-13. doi: 10.22084/ppt.2017.2229
González-García, Y., Cárdenas-Álvarez, C. O. and Benavides-Mendoza, A. (2023). Nanophosphorus and conventional phosphorus fertilizers: Effects on plant growth, phosphorus use efficiency, and soil microbial activity. Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 23(1), 1234-1248.10.1007/s42729-023-01110-z
Gutema, I. O., Demisachew, T. and Alemu, N. D. (2024). Phosphorus fertilizer effects on common bean yield components. Agricultural Research and Development Journal, 9(1), 55–70.
Hajiniya, S. and Zaree, M. (2015). Effect of Co-inoculation of Endophytic Fungus Piriformospora Indica and Azospirillum Strains on Some Physiological Traits, Nutrient Absorption and Grain Yield of Wheat (Triticum aestivum cv. Sardari) Under, 6(2), 149-161.
Hoseinzadeh, N., and Pirzad, A. (2024). Biochemical response and nutrient uptake of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L., Pinto bean) to humic acid and phosphorus sources (biological and chemical) under deficit irrigation. Agricultural Journal of Crop Research Quarterlies, 26(4), 143–164.(in Persian with English abstract).https://doi.org/10.22059/jci.2024.365576.2856
Javan, K., Altaee, A., Darestani, M., Mirabi, M., Azadmanesh, F., Zhou, J. L. and Hosseini, H. (2023). Assessing the Water–Energy–Food Nexus and Resource Sustainability in the Ardabil Plain: A System Dynamics and HWA Approach. Water, 15(20), 3673. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15203673
Li, Y., Wang, X. and Zhang, H. (2022). The interactions between potassium and phosphorus in soil-plant system: A review. Rhizosphere, 23, 100556.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rhisph.2022.100556
Liu, R. and Lal, R. (2015). Potentials of engineered nanoparticles as fertilizers for increasing agronomic productions. Science of The Total Environment, 514, 131-139.https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.01.104
Liu, R. and Lal, R. (2015). Potentials of engineered nanoparticles as fertilizers for increasing agronomic productions. Science of The Total Environment, 514, 131–139. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.01.104
Medina-Velo, I. A., Barrios, A. C., Zuverza-Mena, N., Hernandez-Viezcas, J. A., Chang, C. H., Ji, Z. and Gardea-Torresdey, J. L. (2017). Comparison of the effects of commercial coated and uncoated ZnO nanomaterials and Zn compounds in kidney bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) plants. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 332, 214-222.
Nabati, J. , Yousefi, A. , Hasanfard, A. and Nemati, Z. (2024). Investigating the effect of potassium silicate as a messenger in retransmission in Bitter vetch(Vicia ervilia L). , 16(1), 103-112. doi: 10.22084/ppt.2024.28853.2122
Naseri, R. (2025). Yield, Yield Components, and Gas Exchange in Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) Cultivars Affected by the Applications of Different Sources of Fertilizer under Dryland Farming. Journal Of Agroecology, 17(2), 219-238. (in Persian with English abstract). 10.22067/agry.2023.80366.1138
Nazeri, P., Kashani, A. , Khavazi, K., Ardakani, M. R., Mirakhori, M. and Pour Siah Bidi, M. M. (2010). The effect of biofertilizer and phosphorus fertilizer banding with Zinc on white bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Journal Of Agroecology, 2(1), 175-185. (in Persian with English abstract).https://doi.org/10.22067/jag.v2i1.7617
Page, A. L., Miller, R. H. and Keeney, D. R. (Eds.). (1982). Methods of Soil Analysis: Part 2—Chemical and Microbiological Properties (2nd ed.). American Society of Agronomy, Soil Science Society of America.
Rayate, A. S., Todmal, S. M., Kamble, B. M., Durgude, A. G. and Jadhav, A. B. (2025). Effect of foliar application of nano phosphorus on yield and nutrient uptake of soybean. International Journal of Research in Agronomy, 8(8), 45–52. https://doi.org/10.33545/2618060X.2025.v8.i8f.3557
Raza, Q., Riaz, A., Sabar, M. and Atif, R. M. (2023). Phosphorus nutrition improves drought tolerance in grain legumes through enhanced flower production, pollen viability, and pod set. Journal of Plant Growth Regulation, 42(5), 2871-2886. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-022-10753-8
Rose, T. J. and Wissuwa, M. (2023). Rethinking phosphorus nutrition in plants: From acquisition to utilization and seed set. Plant and Soil, 487(1-2), 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11104-023-05959-y
Ruau, C., Naipal, V., Gagnaire, N., Cantero-Martinez, C., Guenet, B. and Gabrielle, B. (2024). Soil erosion has mixed effects on the environmental impacts of wheat production in a large, semi-arid Mediterranean agricultural basin. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 44(1), 6.10.1007/s13593-023-00942-4
Soheili movahhed, S., Esmaeili, M. A., jabbari, F. and fouladi, A. (2017). Evaluation of Yield and Yield Components of Some Pinto bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Genotypes under Late Season Water Deficit Conditions. Journal Of Agroecology, 9(2), 433-444. (in Persian with English abstract). https://doi.org/10.22067/jag.v9i2.45184
Vahdat Masoud, S. and Aboutalebian, M. A. (2023). Improving the Quantitative, Qualitative and Agronomic Phosphorus Efficiency of Soybean (Glycine max L.). Journal Of Agroecology, 15(4), 769-787. (in Persian with English abstract). 10.22067/agry.2022.75382.1097
Worsfold, P., Gimbert, L. J. and Mankasingh, U. (2016). The molybdenum blue reaction for the determination of orthophosphate. Analytica Chimica Acta, 890, 60–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aca.2015.06.006
Zewdie, T. and Hassen, E . (2020). Review on effects of phosphorus fertilizer rates on growth, yield components and yield of common bean. Journal of Current Research in Food Science, 1(2), 34–39.
Zhu, J., Li, Y. and Zhang, X. (2023). Advances in nano-phosphorus fertilizers for sustainable agriculture. Journal of Nanomaterials and Agriculture, 5(1), 101–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jna.2023.101115