دوفصلنامه فنآوری تولیدات گیاهی

دوفصلنامه فنآوری تولیدات گیاهی

بررسی مقایسه‌ای تأثیر منبع نیتروژن روی رشد و توسعه آوندهای چوبی در گیاه چغندر قند

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسنده
دانشیار،گروه زیست شناسی، دانشکده علوم پایه، دانشگاه پیام نور، تهران، ایران
10.22084/ppt.2026.32141.2182
چکیده
در این تحقیق تأثیر آمونیوم به‌عنوان منبع نیتروژن روی برخی از پارامترهای رشدی، توسعه بافت گزیلم، مقدار لیگنین، فعالیت آنزیم پراکسیداز، مقدار قندها و پروتئین‌ها و رنگیزه‌های فتوسنتزی در گیاه چغندرقند در شرایط هیدروپونیک موردبررسی قرار گرفت. نتایج به‌دست­آمده نشان داد که رشد گیاه چغندر قند به شدت توسط آمونیوم مهار می‌شود، به­طوری­که کاهش 69 درصدی در وزن خشک هیپوکوتیل در تغذیه آمونیومی مشاهده شد. مقدار قند‌های محلول و نامحلول در گیاهان تغذیه شده با آمونیوم به‌طور معنی‌دار کمتر از گیاهان تغذیه شده با نیترات بود، کاهش مقدار قندهای محلول 5/43 و قندهای نامحلول 33 درصد در هیپوکوتیل محاسبه شد. برخلاف قندها، مقدار پروتئین محلول کل اندام هوایی در گیاهان رشد کرده در حضور آمونیوم بیشتر بود. دانه‌رست‌های تغذیه شده با آمونیوم دارای بافت گزیلمی توسعه یافته‌تری در مقایسه با دانه‌رستهای تغذیه شده با نیترات بودند. همچنین آمونیوم باعث افزایش 5/36 درصدی مقدار لیگنین شد که احتمالاً ناشی از تحریک فعالیت پراکسیدازها می‌باشد. لیگنین با کاهش قابلیت انعطاف دیواره‌ها می‌تواند در مهار رشد نقش داشته باشد.
کلیدواژه‌ها
موضوعات

عنوان مقاله English

Comparative Study of Nitrogen Source Effect on Growth and Xylem Development In Sugar Beet Plant

نویسنده English

Masoumeh Abedini
Department of Biology, Faculty of basic sciences, Payame Noor university, Tehran, Iran
چکیده English

Introduction:
Nitrogen (N) is an essential macronutrient, playing the principal role in building block for the fundamental biomolecules such as amino acids, proteins, nucleic acids and chlorophyll. In agricultural systems, plants access soil nitrogen in two inorganic forms: nitrate (NO3−​), and ammonium (NH4+​). The relative availability of these forms in soil and plant preference for them, significantly influence the plant growth, metabolism and crop yield. Sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) is recognized as a nitrate-preferring species, but is capable to utilize ammonium. High concentrations of NH4+ as the sole nitrogen source is toxic‌ for sugar beet and induce obvious stress. The ammonium toxicity is complicated and directly impacts cellular homeostasis such as cytosolic acidification and ionic imbalance. These alterations can modify the cellular metabolism and promotes structural changes. The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of ammonium and nitrate on growth, xylem development and some biochemical features in sugar beet plant.
Materials and Methods:
This study was conducted hydroponically using a completely randomized design with two treatments (nitrate and ammonium, 5 mEq L-¹) and eight repetitions for each treatment. Seedlings were grown for 30 days in a in a growth chamber at 33 ± 1 °C/22 ± 1 °C (day/night) and 85% relative humidity, with a 16/8 h (light/dark) photoperiod. Nutrient solutions were changed every six days, and pH was adjusted to 6.0 every two days. After harvesting, the growth parameters and some biochemical features such as chlorophyll content, soluble and insoluble sugar concentrations, lignin content of hypocotyls and total protein were assayed by spectrophotometric methods. The extension of xylem tissue was measured in plants by preparing the microscopic sections. The means were compared using Tukey's test at a probability level of 5%.
Results and discussion:
Ammonium application as the sole nitrogen source strongly inhibited the growth of sugar beet plants. The fresh and dry weights of plants, root and shoot heights and leaves numbers and area were significantly decreased by ammonium. Although ammonium is a direct source for N, its exclusive usage severely inhibits sugar beet growth. This stunting is likely due to the high energetic cost of ammonium detoxification and diverting photosynthates from growth pathway. Mechanistically, ammonium stress induces elevated putrescine, altered phytohormone signaling (e.g., increased ethylene and suppressed auxin transport via AUX1/PIN2), and the induction of lignin biosynthesis. These changes reduce cell wall flexibility and cause the growth limitations. Significantly, the soluble and non-soluble sugars contents were lower, but the total protein was higher in shoot of plants received ammonium. The reduced levels of sugars indicate limitations in carbon allocation, which is consistent with earlier studies suggesting that ammonium nutrition can disturb carbohydrate metabolism. In contrast, the increase in total protein of shoots may reflect enhanced nitrogen assimilation under ammonium supply. The chlorophyll content of sugar beet plants did not affect by nitrogen source. Ammonium significantly increased the lignin content by induction of peroxidase enzyme activity. It has been reported that ammonium can stimulate lignin biosynthesis by induction of relative enzymes. Lignin accumulation could explain the observed growth inhibition due to decreased wall flexibility. Microscopic studies revealed that ammonium had obviously caused xylem tissue development in hypocotyl region. Under ammonium nutrition, increased lignin biosynthesis diverts carbon flux from primary carbohydrate metabolism. As a consequence, carbon skeletons that would normally be used for sugar and starch biosynthesis are channeled into the phenylpropanoid pathway, leading to greater lignification and lower soluble sugar accumulation in plants.
Conclusion:
According to results, this study demonstrates that utilizing ammonium as the sole nitrogen source in Beta vulgaris (sugar beet) plants, imposes numerous significant physiological and structural constraints. Reduced sugar accumulation, increased lignification and alterations in xylem development, cooperatively inhibit overall plant growth.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Ammonium
peroxidase
xylem
lignin
nitrate
Barłóg, P., Grzebisz, W., Szczepaniak, W. and Peplinski, K. (2014). Sugar beet response to balanced nitrogen fertilization with phosphorus and potassium. Part II. Dynamics of beet quality. Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science, 20(6): 1326-1333.
Bose, S. K., Wilson, R. C., Francis, R. C. and Aoyama, M. (1998). Lignin analysis by permanganate oxidation, I. Native spruce lignin. Holzforschung, 52: 297–303. https://doi.org/10.1515/hfsg.1998.52.3.297.
Breteler, H. (1973). A comparison between ammonium and nitrate nutrition of young sugar-beet plants grown in nutrient solutions at constant acidity. 1. Production of dry matter, ionic balance and chemical composition. Netherlands Journal of agricultural Science 21 (1973): 227-244.
Britto, D. T. and Kronzucker, H.J. (2013). Ecological significance and complexity of N‐source preference in plants. Annals of Botany,112: 957–963. https://doi.org/10.1093/aob/mct157.
Champigny, M. L., Brauer, M., Bismuth, E., Cao Thi Manh, SiegI, G., Le Van Quyi, and Stitt, M. (1992). The short-term effect of NO3− and NH3 assimilation on sucrose synthesis in leaves. Journal of Plant Physiology, 139(3): 361-368.
 
Chance, B. and Maehly, A. (1955). Assay of catalases and peroxidases. Methods in Enzymology, 2: 764–817 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0076-6879(55)02300-8.
Chance, O. W., Somda, Z. C. and Mills, H.A. (1999). Effect of nitrogen form during the flowering period on zucchini squash growth and nutrient element uptake. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 22: 597–607. https://doi.org/10.1080/01904169909365653.
Chen, H., Jia, Y., Xu, H., Wang, Y., Zhou, Y., Huang, Z., Yang, L., Li, Y., Chen, L.S. and Guo, J. (2020). Ammonium nutrition inhibits plant growth and nitrogen uptake in citrus seedlings. Scientia Horticulturae, 272: 109526. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scienta.2020.109526.
Cheng, Q., Yi, K. and Wu, P. (2011). Ammonium affects cell viability to inhibit root growth in Arabidopsis. Journal of Zhejiang University–Science B, 12: 477–484. https://org.doi/10.1631/jzus.B1000335.
Dong, Y., Liu, Y., Li, X., Geng, G., Yu, L., Xu, Y., Liu, J. and Wang, Y. (2025). Physiol-biochemical, transcriptome, and root microstructure analyses reveal the mechanism of salt shock recovery in sugar beet. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 223, 109820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2025.109820.
Dubois, M. K. A., Gilles, J. K., Hamilton, P. A., Rebers, F. and Smith, F. (1956). Colorimetric method for determination of sugars and related substances. Annals of Chemistry, 28: 350–356. https://doi.org/10.1021/ac60111a017.
Esteban, R., Ariz, I., Cruz, C. and Moran, J.F. (2016). Review: Mechanisms of ammonium toxicity and the quest for tolerance. Plant Science, 248: 92-101. https://doi.org/doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2016.04.008.
Fadel, J. G., DePeters, E. J. and Arosemena, A. (2000). Composition and digestibility of beet pulp with and without molasses and dried using three methods. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 85: 121–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-8401(00)00129-1.
Fan, L., Linker, R., Gepstein, S., Tanimoto, E., Yamamoto, R. and Neumann, P.M. (2006). Progressive inhibition by water deficit of cell wall extensibility and growth along the elongation zone of maize roots is related to increased lignin metabolism and progressive stelar accumulation of wall phenolics. Plant Physiology, 140: 603–612. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.105.073130.
Gahan, P.B. (1984). Plant Histochemistry and Cytochemistry: An Introduction. London, UK, Academic Press.

Gao, J., Li, L., Hu, Z., Zhu, S., Zhang, R. and Xiong, Z. (2015). Ammonia stress on the carbon metabolism of Ceratophyllum demersum. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 34(4): 843-849. https://doi.org/ 10.1002/etc.2866.

Gao, J., Liu, L., Ma, N., Yang, J., Dong, Z., Zhang, J., Zhang, J. and Cai, M. (2020). Effect of ammonia stress on carbon metabolism in tolerant aquatic plant Myriophyllum aquaticum (2020). Environmental Pollution, 263, 114412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.114412.
 Gaoua, O. (2025). Integrating physiological, biochemical, and molecular mechanisms reveals insights into drought tolerance in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.). Discover Plants: 2, 325. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44372-025-00416-9.
Garnica, M., Houdusse, F., Yvin, J. C. and Garcia-Mina, J. M. (2009). Nitrate supply induces changes in polyamine content and ethylene production in wheat plants grown with ammonium. Journal of Plant Physiology, 166: 363–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2008.06.003.
Han, X., Zhao, Y., Chen, Y., Xu, J., Jiang, C., Wang, X., Zhuo, R., Lu, M. Z. and Zhang, J. (2022). Lignin biosynthesis and accumulation in response to abiotic stresses in woody plants. Forestry Research, 2: 9. https://doi.org/ 10.48130/FR-2022-0009.
Hermans, C., Hammond, J. P., White, P. J. and Verbruggen, N. (2006). How do plants respond to nutrient shortage by biomass allocation? Trends in Plant Science, 11(12), 610-617. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2006.10.007.
Horchani, F., Hajri, R. and Aschi-Smiti, S. (2010). Effect of ammonium or nitrate nutrition on photosynthesis, growth, and nitrogen assimilation in tomato plants. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, 137: 610–617 https://doi.org/10.1002/jpln.200900117.
Jung, H. G. and Vogel, K. P. (1986). Influence of lignin on digestibility of forage cell wall material. Journal of Animal Science, 62(6): 1703-1712. https://doi.org/10.257/jas1986.6261703x.
Jančíková, V. and Jablonský, M. (2022). Delignification of hemp stalk using a low transition temperature mixture temperature mixture composed choline chloride and lactic acid. BioResources, 17(1): 1232-1240. https://doi.org/10.15376/biores.17.1.1232-1240.
Kogel, A. (2020). Effects of ammonium or nitrate nutrition on wood formation of Populus sp. and Arabidopsis thaliana. Universitätsverlag Göttingen.
 
Lee, B.R., Kim, K.Y., Jung, W.J., Avice, J. C., Ourry, A. and Kim, T.H. (2007). Peroxidases and lignification in relation to the intensity of water-deficit stress in white clover (Trifolium repens L.). Journal of Experimental Botany, 58: 1271–1279. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erl280.
Li, G., Li, B., Don, G., Feng, X., Kronzucker, H. J. and Shi, W. (2013). Ammonium-induced shoot ethylene production is associated with the inhibition of lateral root formation in Arabidopsis. Journal of Experimental Botany, 64: 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/ert019.
Li, X. and Chapple, C. (2010). Understanding lignification: Challenges beyond monolignol biosynthesis. Plant Physiology, 154: 449–452. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.110.162842.
Liu, Y., Lai, N., Gao, K., Chen, F., Yuan, L. and Mi, G. (2013). Ammonium inhibits primary root growth by reducing the length of meristem and elongation zone and decreasing elemental expansion rate in the root apex in Arabidopsis thaliana. PLOS One, 8: e61031. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/ert019.
Lowry, O. H., Rosebrough, N. J., Farr, A. L. and Randall, R. J. (1951). Protein measurement with the Folin-Phenol reagent. Journal of Biological Chemistry, 193: 265–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9258(19)52451-6.
Ma, F. and Peterson, C. A. (2003). Current insights into the development, structure and chemistry of the endodermis and exodermis of roots. Canadian Journal of Botany, 81(5), 405-421. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-003-0002-2.
Moran, R. (1982). Formulae for determination of chlorophyllous pigments extracted with N,N-dimethylformamide. Plant Physiology, 69: 1376–1381. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.69.6.1376.
Munekata, P. E. S., Pateiro, M., Domínguez, R., Pollonio, M. A. R., Sepúlveda, N., Andres, S. C., Reyes, J., Santos, E. M. and Lorenzo, J. M. (2021). Beta vulgaris as a natural nitrate source for meat products: a review. Foods, 10(9): 2094. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods10092094.
 Nikitin, A. V., Bruskova, R. K., Andreeva, T. M., and Izmailov, S. F. (2010). Effect of ammonia on sucrose synthase in pea roots. Russian journal of plant physiology, 57(1), 69-73.
Quebedeaux, B., Jr. and Ozbun, J. L. (1973). Effects of ammonium nutrition on water stress, water uptake, and root pressure in Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. Plant Physiology, 52(6), 677-679.
Ranathunge, K., Schreiber, L., Bi, Y. M. and Rothstein, S. J. (2016). Ammonium-induced architectural and anatomical changes with altered suberin and lignin levels significantly change water and solute permeabilities of rice (Oryza sativa L.) roots. Planta, 243(1): 231-249. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00425-015-2406-1.
Rothstein, D.E. and Cregg, B.M. (2005). Effects of nitrogen form on nutrient uptake and physiology of Fraser fir (Abies fraseri). Forest Ecology and Management, 219: 69–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2005.08.002.
Santamaria, P., Elia, A., Papa, G. and Serio, F. (1998). Nitrate and ammonium nutrition in chicory and rocket salad plants. Journal of Plant Nutrition, 21: 1779–1789. https://doi.org/10.1080/01904169809365523.
Scullin, C., Cruz, A. G., Chuang, Y. D., Simmons, B. A., Loque, D. and Singh, S. (2015). Restricting lignin and enhancing sugar deposition in secondary cell walls enhances monomeric sugar release after low temperature ionic liquid pretreatment. Biotechnology for Biofuels, 8, 95. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13068-015-0275-2.
Sheng, S., Wu, C., Xiang, Y., Pu, W., Duan, S., Huang, P., Cheng, X., Gong, Y., Liang, Y. and Liu, L. (2022). Polyamine: A potent ameliorator for plant growth response and adaption to abiotic stresses particularly the ammonium stress antagonized by urea. Frontiers in Plant Science, 13, 783597. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.783597.
Shilpha, J., Song, J. and Jeong, B. R. (2023). Ammonium phytotoxicity and tolerance: An insight into ammonium nutrition to improve crop productivity. Agronomy, 13(6), 1487. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13061487.
Smolov, A.P. and Semenova, G.A. (2008). Effect of ammonium concentration on protein and chlorophyll contents and the number of ribosomes in the cells of soybean mixotrophic callus. Russian Journal of Plant Physiology, 55: 359–364. https://doi.org/10.1134/S102144370803012X.
Soltanpanahi, S., Kammardi, T. N. P. and Ghaderzadeh, H. (2013). Analysis of input-output energy use in sugar beet production in Iran. World Applied Sciences Journal, 28: 1252–1261.
Stuart, M. and Haddock, J. L. (1968). Inhibition of water uptake in sugar beet roots by ammonia. Plant Physiology, 43: 345-350.
Studer, M. H., DeMartini, J. D., Davis, M. F., Sykes, R. W., Davison, B., Keller, M., Tuskan, G. A. and Wyman, C. E. (2011). Lignin content in natural Populus variants affects sugar release. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108(15), 6300-6305. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1009252108.
Ulrich, A. and Mostafa, M. A. E. (1980). Ammonium and nitrate as sources of nitrogen for sugar beets. Journal of the American Society of Sugar Beet Technology, 553-570.
Vanholme, R., Meester, B. D., Ralph, J., Boerjan, W. (2019).  Lignin biosynthesis and its integration into metabolism. Current Opinion in Biotechnology, 26: 230-239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2019.02.018.
Varga, I., Jovi´, J., Rastija, M., Kulundži´, A. M., Zebec, W., Lonˇcari´, Z., Iljki´, D. and Antunovi´, M. (2022). Efficiency and management of nitrogen fertilization in sugar beet as spring crop: A review. Nitrogen, 3: 170-185. https://doi.org/10.3390/nitrogen3020013.
Viciedo, D.O., Prado, R. M., Toledo, R. L., dos Santos, L. C. N., Hurtado, A. C., Nedd, L. L. T. and Gonzalez, L. C. (2019). Silicon supplementation alleviates ammonium toxicity in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.). Journal of Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 19(2), 413-419. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42729-019-00043-w.
Wang, G. L., Wu, J. Q., Chen, Y. Y., Xu, Y.J., Zhou, C.L., Hu, Z. Z., Ren, X. Q. and Xiong A.S. (2023). More or Less: Recent advances in lignin accumulation and regulation in horticultural crops. Agronomy, 13(11): 2819. https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy13112819.